Review: Fool’s Gold, A Dragonfire Station Short Story

By Zen DiPietro

Read as part of the Monthly Keyword Reading Challenge back in March. I was lazy about reviewing this one.

Available on: Amazon and Kobo.

Overview:

Blurb: Having his bedroom filed with contraband by his ever-so-wonderful sister is the least of his problems.

Trigger Warnings:

Questionable Morals

Body Count: 0

The Specs:

• Series 
  • Series Name:
  • Book Number:
• Genre
  • Technical Genre: 45-Minute Science Fiction & Fantasy Short Reads, 45-Minute Literature & Fiction Short Reads, Science Fiction Adventure
  • Theo Genre
• POV:
• Publication information:
  • Paperback page count: 25 pages/3,979 KB for ebook.
  • Publisher: Parallel Worlds Press
  • Language:  English
  • ASIN: B073RW2C1G

Other Fun Stuff:

To Read or Not To Read (Again):

Donated

Rating out of five: 2.5 out of 5

Representation, Morality, and Sexism Tests:

• Bechdel–Wallace Test: 
  • Purpose: to establish actual female characters that act independently of male characters in a story.
    • Do two female characters talk about something other than a male character? Yes
  • Pass or Fail: Pass
• DuVernay Test:
  • Purpose: to establish characters of color in a story.
    • Are there fully actualized characters of color? No
  • Pass or Fail: Fail
• Ellen Willis Test:
  • Purpose: to show balance in characters regardless of gender.
    • Would two related characters still work to carry the story if their genders were reversed? Yes
  • Pass or Fail: Pass
• Hays Code Test:
  • Purpose: to ignore outdated and queer-degrading/punishing standards that once were the standard for produced mass media.
  • Part One: outdated moral guidelines
    • Are there any outdated “moral content” rules gloriously kicked in the teeth by this story?
    • Are there people of color allowed a happy ending?
    • Is there an interracial couple?
    • Is there profanity used at all?
    • Is there one or more homicidal acts and/or murder?
  • Part Two: queer representation
    • Are there queer characters that get a happy ending?
    • Is there an illegal or otherwise distasteful age gap between characters, queer or otherwise?
    • Do the queer characters die tragically, violently, or at all?
  • Pass or Fail: Fail
• Mako Mori Test:
  • Purpose: to assure that in the story there is at least one female character independent of a male character’s story.
    • Is there a female character? Yes
    • Does she get her own arc? Yes
    • Does it do anything other than serve to support a man’s story? Yes
  • Pass or Fail: Pass
• Sexy Lamp Test:
  • Purpose: to assure that a female character in the story serves as an active protagonist, not just a device to be used by the male main character.
    • Would the plot fall apart if the female character was replaced by a sexy looking lamp? Yes
  • Post-It Note Caveat:
    • Would the character be able to be replaced by a Sexy Lamp with a sticky note on it for information conveyance? NO
  • Pass or Fail: Pass
• Tauriel Test:
  • Purpose: to help support the existence of competent, independent female characters regardless of a romantic sub-plot.
    • Is there at least one woman in the story?
    • Is this woman competent in her chosen occupation and not immediately shown up by a newcomer male character?
    • If she has or develops a love interest during the story, either implied or explicitly stated, does she suddenly abandon her job and/or chosen path to support or pursue said love interest? 
  • Pass or Fail: Pass
• Vito Russo Test:
  • Purpose: to establish more characters that are on the SAGA (Sexuality And Gender Acceptance), QTPOC (Queer and Trans People of Color) or LGBTQIAP+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual/Biromantic/Bigender, Transgender, Queer/Genderqueer, Intersex, Asexual/Aromantic/Agender, Pansexual/Panromantic, and others not listed here) spectrum.
    • Is there a character on the queer spectrum?
    • Are they a character beyond their orientation?
    • Do they actually affect the plot?
    • Is the character something beyond a punchline?
  • Pass or Fail: Fail

Overall review:

Thoughts:

An interesting little romp that I would love to read more of; a decent short but it felt more like a scene than a full story itself.

Was it engaging?

Yes

Review format updated 5 March 2019